top of page

Resources 

 

​

​Thinking Habits: Recognising Cognitive Distortions

​

Our thoughts influence how we approach learning, practice and performance. Sometimes we treat a thought as a fact without stopping to question it.

Cognitive distortions are patterns of thinking that give us an incomplete or exaggerated view of a situation. We all use them at times. Recognising them can help us respond with more perspective and less unnecessary pressure.

​

​

Some common thinking habits

​

All-or-nothing thinking
Seeing only two possibilities: success or failure, perfect or terrible.
“If I make a mistake, the whole performance is ruined.”

​

Overgeneralising
Turning one experience into a conclusion about everything.
“That audition went badly. I’ll never get anywhere.”

​

Focusing on the negative
Giving one difficulty all your attention and overlooking what went well.
“All I can remember is the passage I got wrong.”

​

Dismissing the positive
Finding reasons why an achievement or encouraging feedback doesn’t count.
“My teacher said I’d improved, but they were probably just being kind.”

​

Mind reading
Assuming you know what someone else thinks without checking.
“They looked bored. They must think I’m a poor musician.”

​

Predicting the worst
Treating a feared outcome as though it is certain.
“I know I’m going to freeze on stage.”

​

Treating feelings as facts
Assuming that how you feel proves something about your ability or situation.
“I feel unprepared, so I must be unprepared.”
The feeling is real, but the conclusion may need checking.

​

Rigid rules and labels
Putting pressure on yourself with “should” and “must”, or judging your whole self from one event.
“I should never feel nervous.”
“I made a mistake. I’m useless.

 

​

How can this help?

​

Noticing these habits gives you an opportunity to pause before reacting. You can acknowledge a difficulty without turning it into a judgement about yourself or your future.

​

When a thought adds pressure, try asking:

  • What happened, and what am I adding to it?

  • What evidence supports my conclusion? What might I be overlooking?

  • Is there another possible explanation?

  • What would I say to a fellow student in this situation?

  • What useful step can I take now?

  • ​

For example:

“I stumbled in that passage. I’m not good enough.”

​

Could become:

“I stumbled in that passage today. Other parts went well. I can explore what made it difficult and decide how to practise it.”

You don’t have to force yourself to think positively. Aim for a view that is accurate, fair and useful.

​

 

A connection with the Alexander Technique

​

Just as we can notice habitual ways of moving, we can notice habitual ways of thinking. A familiar thought doesn’t have to lead immediately to a familiar reaction.

You might notice “I must get this right”, pause, and give yourself time to choose how to continue. This creates room for curiosity, experimentation and learning.

​

 

(Based on ideas discussed in “Cognitive Distortions” by Courtney E. Ackerman (2017), drawing on the work of Aaron Beck and David Burns.)

 

bottom of page